PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVVX vs. RYCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVVX vs. RYCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund (RYVVX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVVX achieves a 15.34% return, which is significantly higher than RYCKX's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVVX has outperformed RYCKX with an annualized return of 8.74%, while RYCKX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.23% annualized return.


RYVVX

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.99%
6M
11.25%
YTD
15.34%
1Y
31.55%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
8.74%
ALL TIME*
5.91%

RYCKX

1D
2.48%
1M
-4.87%
6M
7.29%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*
7.23%
ALL TIME*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYVVX vs. RYCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVVX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund
15.34%15.67%9.88%5.72%-3.31%31.12%-10.98%22.34%-13.91%15.07%
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
12.35%6.61%15.10%13.97%-23.05%11.26%29.72%14.60%-15.17%18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVVX and RYCKX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between RYVVX and RYCKX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVVX vs. RYCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYVVX
RYVVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RYVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCKX
RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYVVX vs. RYCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund (RYVVX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYVVXRYCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.13

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

1.31

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.92

4.47

+8.45

RYVVX vs. RYCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the RYCKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVVX and RYCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYVVX vs. RYCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVVX drawdown since its inception was -82.48%, which is greater than RYCKX's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVVX and RYCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVVXRYCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.48%

-52.60%

-29.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-10.50%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.44%

-27.14%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.78%

-35.98%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.41%

-44.75%

-6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-7.89%

+6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-9.47%

-7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

3.16%

-0.91%

Volatility

RYVVX vs. RYCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund (RYVVX) is 3.11%, while Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that RYVVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVVXRYCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

6.19%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

16.24%

-8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

19.70%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

22.97%

-5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

23.11%

-1.35%

RYVVX vs. RYCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RYVVX and RYCKX have an expense ratio of 2.26%.


Dividends

RYVVX vs. RYCKX - Dividend Comparison

RYVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.92%0.00%14.34%13.66%1.29%0.00%18.93%7.60%1.72%5.90%
RYVVX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund
0.21%0.25%1.16%2.24%2.86%2.87%1.13%1.17%10.39%1.30%1.04%9.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYVVX and RYCKX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCKX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to RYVVX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVVX dropped -82.48% vs RYCKX's -52.60%.

RYVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVVX and RYCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer