PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVVX vs. NEIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVVX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund (RYVVX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVVX achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVVX has underperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 8.34%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.


RYVVX

1D
0.48%
1M
2.51%
YTD
9.63%
6M
11.76%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
8.34%

NEIMX

1D
-0.40%
1M
3.16%
YTD
15.83%
6M
16.30%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYVVX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVVX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund
9.63%15.67%9.88%5.72%-3.31%31.12%-10.98%22.34%-13.91%15.07%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
15.83%18.68%13.50%6.15%-5.16%23.85%-5.97%23.49%-9.76%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVVX and NEIMX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between RYVVX and NEIMX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVVX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYVVX
RYVVX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RYVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NEIMX
NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYVVX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund (RYVVX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYVVXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

3.36

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

4.65

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.62

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

5.91

-2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.06

24.73

-13.67

RYVVX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVVX and NEIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYVVXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

3.36

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.02

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.03

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.03

+0.20

Drawdowns

RYVVX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVVX drawdown since its inception was -82.48%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVVX and NEIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVVXNEIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.48%

-92.94%

+10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-5.75%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-92.94%

+77.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.78%

-92.94%

+69.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.41%

-92.94%

+41.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-89.12%

+89.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-10.50%

-6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

1.37%

+0.99%

Volatility

RYVVX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund (RYVVX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVVXNEIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.50%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

7.75%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

10.14%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

576.30%

-558.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

407.70%

-385.81%

RYVVX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVVX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYVVX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

RYVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
0.65%0.76%1.10%1.36%3.60%17.65%1.20%2.26%1.20%6.64%10.20%4.19%
RYVVX
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund
0.22%0.25%1.16%2.24%2.86%2.87%1.13%1.17%10.39%1.30%1.04%9.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYVVX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYVVX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to NEIMX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVVX dropped -82.48% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVVX and NEIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer