RYVFX vs. PVCMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX).

RYVFX is managed by Royce Investment Partners. It was launched on Jun 14, 2001. PVCMX is managed by Palm Valley. It was launched on Apr 30, 2019.

Performance

RYVFX vs. PVCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RYVFX vs. PVCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RYVFX Royce Small-Cap Value Fund	2.26%	6.77%	3.20%	26.40%	-10.18%	28.15%	-6.47%	11.95%
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class	0.58%	4.45%	4.24%	9.47%	3.17%	3.72%	19.13%	1.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVFX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than PVCMX's 0.58% return.

RYVFX

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 3.20%
• 1Y: 22.39%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: 6.93%

PVCMX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 4.45%
• 3Y*: 5.18%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYVFX vs. PVCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PVCMX's 1.30% expense ratio.

RYVFX

Royce Small-Cap Value Fund

PVCMX

Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class

Return for Risk

RYVFX vs. PVCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYVFX

RYVFX Risk / Return Rank: 54
RYVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RYVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RYVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RYVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RYVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

PVCMX

PVCMX Risk / Return Rank: 49
PVCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PVCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
PVCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PVCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PVCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYVFX vs. PVCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RYVFX	PVCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	0.92	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	1.44	+0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.17	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.52	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.80	4.20	+0.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RYVFX vs. PVCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the PVCMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVFX and PVCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RYVFX	PVCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	0.92	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.84	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	1.04	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between RYVFX and PVCMX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RYVFX vs. PVCMX - Dividend Comparison

RYVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, more than PVCMX's 4.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYVFX Royce Small-Cap Value Fund	9.94%	10.17%	6.03%	8.20%	6.02%	5.77%	3.92%	3.19%	13.14%	3.45%	5.59%	19.64%
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class	4.77%	4.80%	6.95%	4.84%	2.30%	1.98%	2.70%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RYVFX vs. PVCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVFX drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, which is greater than PVCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVFX and PVCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYVFX	PVCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.72%	-7.44%	-50.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.66%	-2.81%	-10.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.20%	-7.44%	-20.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.01%	-1.85%	-5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.86%	-1.29%	-8.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	1.02%	+3.20%

Volatility

RYVFX vs. PVCMX - Volatility Comparison

Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX) at 0.95%. This indicates that RYVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYVFX	PVCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	0.95%	+3.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.09%	2.94%	+9.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.57%	4.75%	+17.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.56%	5.20%	+15.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.48%	6.37%	+16.11%