PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVFX vs. DFEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVFX vs. DFEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVFX achieves a 21.07% return, which is significantly higher than DFEMX's 17.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RYVFX having a 8.87% annualized return and DFEMX not far ahead at 9.27%.


RYVFX

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.20%
6M
15.26%
YTD
21.07%
1Y
36.49%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
8.87%
ALL TIME*
8.58%

DFEMX

1D
3.65%
1M
-4.00%
6M
8.21%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
35.53%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
9.27%
ALL TIME*
7.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYVFX vs. DFEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVFX
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund
21.07%6.77%3.20%26.40%-10.18%28.15%-6.47%18.26%-7.37%4.93%
DFEMX
DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio
17.07%33.57%6.90%13.08%-16.91%2.53%13.89%16.02%-13.62%36.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVFX and DFEMX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between RYVFX and DFEMX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVFX vs. DFEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYVFX
RYVFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RYVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEMX
DFEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYVFX vs. DFEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYVFXDFEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

2.33

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.82

7.75

+2.08

RYVFX vs. DFEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the DFEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVFX and DFEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYVFX vs. DFEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVFX drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, smaller than the maximum DFEMX drawdown of -62.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVFX and DFEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVFXDFEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.72%

-62.43%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-14.29%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-16.12%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-29.53%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.56%

-40.44%

-8.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-11.16%

+9.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-15.29%

+5.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

4.28%

-0.88%

Volatility

RYVFX vs. DFEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) is 3.54%, while DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that RYVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVFXDFEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

9.34%

-5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

20.34%

-9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

21.83%

-5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

16.81%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.39%

17.01%

+5.38%

RYVFX vs. DFEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYVFX vs. DFEMX - Dividend Comparison

RYVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than DFEMX's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFEMX
DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio
2.09%2.55%3.14%3.34%3.90%6.13%1.45%2.33%2.14%1.74%1.92%2.08%
RYVFX
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund
8.40%10.17%6.03%8.20%6.02%5.77%3.92%3.19%13.14%3.45%5.59%19.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYVFX and DFEMX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEMX has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to RYVFX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVFX dropped -57.72% vs DFEMX's -62.43%.

RYVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVFX and DFEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer