RYOCX vs. MSFT
RYOCX (Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX returned 20.19%/yr vs 23.73%/yr for MSFT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RYOCX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYOCX achieves a 16.48% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -16.69% return. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 20.19%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.73% annualized return.
RYOCX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- 28.07%
- 3Y*
- 23.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.41%
- 10Y*
- 20.19%
MSFT
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- 6M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- -16.69%
- 1Y
- -20.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 23.73%
RYOCX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 16.48% | 19.51% | 24.34% | 53.31% | -33.34% | 25.85% | 46.80% | 40.33% | -1.36% | 31.20% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -16.69% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYOCX and MSFT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RYOCX and MSFT has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYOCX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
RYOCX
MSFT
RYOCX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYOCX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.89 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | -0.58 | +2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | -1.08 | +9.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYOCX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYOCX drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYOCX and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYOCX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.75% | -69.38% | -14.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -34.50% | +22.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.97% | -34.50% | +11.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.04% | -37.15% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.04% | -37.15% | -0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -25.54% | +21.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.78% | -21.80% | -9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 18.60% | -15.12% |
Volatility
RYOCX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) is 7.82%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that RYOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYOCX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 10.80% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.30% | 24.46% | -9.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 27.35% | -8.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 27.05% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 27.18% | -4.42% |
Dividends
RYOCX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than MSFT's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.89% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 3.67% | 4.28% | 7.23% | 0.00% | 8.82% | 4.47% | 4.17% | 3.80% | 1.86% | 6.00% | 1.75% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYOCX and MSFT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to RYOCX (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYOCX dropped -83.75% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
RYOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYOCX and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer