PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYOCX vs. GOF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYOCX vs. GOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYOCX achieves a 21.14% return, which is significantly higher than GOF's -7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX has outperformed GOF with an annualized return of 20.87%, while GOF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.


RYOCX

1D
0.48%
1M
10.86%
YTD
21.14%
6M
19.39%
1Y
40.77%
3Y*
27.60%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
20.87%

GOF

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-7.43%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
-12.09%
3Y*
3.15%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYOCX vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
21.14%19.51%24.34%53.31%-33.34%25.85%46.80%40.33%-1.36%31.20%
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
-7.43%-1.92%38.04%-3.04%-5.78%4.90%21.51%10.51%-5.95%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RYOCX and GOF is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2007

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYOCX vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYOCX
RYOCX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RYOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RYOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GOF
GOF Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
GOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOF Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYOCX vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYOCXGOFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.88

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

-0.52

+3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

-0.99

+13.95

RYOCX vs. GOF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYOCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the GOF Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYOCX and GOF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYOCXGOFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

-0.68

+3.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.05

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.41

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.42

+0.13

Drawdowns

RYOCX vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYOCX drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, which is greater than GOF's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYOCX and GOF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYOCXGOFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.75%

-54.66%

-29.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-23.24%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.97%

-28.56%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.04%

-32.41%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

-38.50%

+0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.55%

+17.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-7.06%

-24.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

12.18%

-8.94%

Volatility

RYOCX vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison

Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) at 3.30%. This indicates that RYOCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYOCXGOFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.30%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

10.88%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

17.92%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

18.19%

+4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.62%

19.52%

+3.10%

RYOCX vs. GOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYOCX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GOF's 1.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYOCX vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison

RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than GOF's 19.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
19.79%16.97%14.32%17.07%14.36%11.93%11.26%12.08%11.96%10.13%11.13%12.98%
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
3.53%4.28%7.23%0.00%8.82%4.47%4.17%3.80%1.86%6.00%1.75%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYOCX and GOF have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYOCX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to GOF (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYOCX dropped -83.75% vs GOF's -54.66%.

RYOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYOCX and GOF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer