RYOCX vs. FOCKX
RYOCX (Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class) and FOCKX (Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX returned 21.36%/yr vs 23.46%/yr for FOCKX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYOCX charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for FOCKX.
Performance
RYOCX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYOCX achieves a 19.89% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 27.09% return. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX has underperformed FOCKX with an annualized return of 21.36%, while FOCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.46% annualized return.
RYOCX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 19.89%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 38.08%
- 3Y*
- 26.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.36%
FOCKX
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 27.09%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 56.90%
- 3Y*
- 34.24%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 23.46%
RYOCX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 19.89% | 19.51% | 24.34% | 53.31% | -33.34% | 25.85% | 46.80% | 40.33% | -1.36% | 31.20% |
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K | 27.09% | 22.28% | 38.91% | 42.92% | -32.07% | 25.06% | 46.83% | 39.36% | -3.18% | 38.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYOCX and FOCKX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RYOCX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYOCX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank
RYOCX
FOCKX
RYOCX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYOCX | FOCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.50 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 5.18 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 21.92 | -10.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYOCX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYOCX drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, which is greater than FOCKX's maximum drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYOCX and FOCKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYOCX | FOCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.75% | -53.33% | -30.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -11.28% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.97% | -24.83% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.04% | -36.97% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.04% | -36.97% | -1.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -2.01% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -8.36% | -23.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.65% | +0.69% |
Volatility
RYOCX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) is 8.37%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that RYOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYOCX | FOCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 8.99% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 16.00% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 19.60% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 22.97% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 22.59% | +0.16% |
RYOCX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYOCX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCKX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYOCX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison
RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than FOCKX's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K | 5.94% | 7.56% | 16.42% | 0.09% | 3.97% | 11.34% | 6.18% | 7.49% | 7.81% | 4.85% | 3.25% | 5.42% |
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 3.57% | 4.28% | 7.23% | 0.00% | 8.82% | 4.47% | 4.17% | 3.80% | 1.86% | 6.00% | 1.75% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, RYOCX and FOCKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FOCKX has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to RYOCX (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYOCX dropped -83.75% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.
FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYOCX and FOCKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer