RYMTX vs. ABYIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RYMTX (Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and ABYIX (Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 10 years, RYMTX returned 3.72%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for ABYIX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RYMTX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for ABYIX.

Performance

RYMTX vs. ABYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMTX achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than ABYIX's 7.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RYMTX having a 3.72% annualized return and ABYIX not far behind at 3.54%.

RYMTX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 4.57%
• 5Y*: 5.91%
• 10Y*: 3.72%

ABYIX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 16.05%
• 3Y*: 2.75%
• 5Y*: 3.73%
• 10Y*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMTX vs. ABYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYMTX Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund	8.95%	5.52%	0.56%	3.62%	14.75%	2.62%	2.07%	7.18%	-7.87%	7.39%
ABYIX Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I	7.88%	1.62%	1.11%	-3.29%	17.06%	3.39%	7.92%	8.84%	-6.15%	-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMTX and ABYIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014	0.72

The correlation between RYMTX and ABYIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYMTX vs. ABYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMTX

RYMTX Risk / Return Rank: 53
RYMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RYMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RYMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RYMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RYMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ABYIX

ABYIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
ABYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ABYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ABYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ABYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ABYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMTX vs. ABYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) and Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RYMTX	ABYIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.08	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.89	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.38	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	5.61	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.88	15.20	-1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RYMTX vs. ABYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the ABYIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMTX and ABYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RYMTX	ABYIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	2.08	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.47	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.44	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.56	-0.46

Drawdowns

RYMTX vs. ABYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMTX drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, which is greater than ABYIX's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMTX and ABYIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYMTX	ABYIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.19%	-17.13%	-17.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.43%	-2.85%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.54%	-14.00%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.54%	-14.66%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.54%	-14.74%	-2.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.83%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-6.66%	-12.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	1.05%	+0.37%

Volatility

RYMTX vs. ABYIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) is 1.72%, while Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that RYMTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYMTX	ABYIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.72%	2.10%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.46%	5.91%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.10%	7.69%	+3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.15%	7.99%	+4.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.65%	8.02%	+2.63%

RYMTX vs. ABYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMTX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ABYIX's 1.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYMTX vs. ABYIX - Dividend Comparison

RYMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than ABYIX's 1.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABYIX Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I	1.23%	1.33%	2.10%	2.03%	15.24%	3.68%	1.54%	8.70%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
RYMTX Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund	5.53%	6.03%	5.10%	1.02%	4.80%	0.00%	7.56%	0.00%	0.00%	4.70%	5.19%	2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYMTX and ABYIX in my portfolio?

RYMTX and ABYIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYMTX or ABYIX?

ABYIX has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to RYMTX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMTX dropped -34.19% vs ABYIX's -17.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.