PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMEX vs. RYCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMEX vs. RYCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMEX achieves a 40.27% return, which is significantly higher than RYCKX's 20.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMEX has underperformed RYCKX with an annualized return of 7.41%, while RYCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


RYMEX

1D
0.66%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
40.27%
6M
38.90%
1Y
48.61%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
7.41%

RYCKX

1D
0.61%
1M
6.36%
YTD
20.27%
6M
19.77%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMEX vs. RYCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMEX
Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund
40.27%4.70%8.24%-6.14%23.72%39.03%-22.99%15.48%-14.96%4.67%
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
20.27%6.61%15.10%13.97%-23.05%11.26%29.72%14.60%-15.17%18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMEX and RYCKX is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.29

The correlation between RYMEX and RYCKX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMEX vs. RYCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMEX
RYMEX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RYMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCKX
RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMEX vs. RYCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYMEXRYCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.12

2.95

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

11.86

+1.23

RYMEX vs. RYCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the RYCKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMEX and RYCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYMEXRYCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.69

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.28

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.36

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.35

-0.48

Drawdowns

RYMEX vs. RYCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMEX drawdown since its inception was -91.81%, which is greater than RYCKX's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMEX and RYCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMEXRYCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.81%

-52.60%

-39.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-10.50%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-27.14%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.45%

-35.98%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.20%

-44.75%

-14.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.73%

0.00%

-65.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-9.52%

-56.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.60%

+1.16%

Volatility

RYMEX vs. RYCKX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX) has a higher volatility of 8.20% compared to Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) at 6.42%. This indicates that RYMEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMEXRYCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.20%

6.42%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.39%

14.65%

+6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.94%

18.34%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

22.78%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

23.06%

-0.74%

RYMEX vs. RYCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMEX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCKX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMEX vs. RYCKX - Dividend Comparison

RYMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.92%0.00%14.34%13.66%1.29%0.00%18.93%7.60%1.72%5.90%
RYMEX
Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund
1.70%2.38%0.00%4.98%17.15%2.97%109.50%0.74%44.23%1.49%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMEX and RYCKX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYMEX has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to RYCKX (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMEX dropped -91.81% vs RYCKX's -52.60%.

RYMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMEX and RYCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer