PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMDX vs. RYCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMDX vs. RYCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMDX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMDX achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than RYCKX's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMDX has outperformed RYCKX with an annualized return of 11.31%, while RYCKX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.23% annualized return.


RYMDX

1D
1.21%
1M
-1.78%
6M
13.00%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
11.31%
ALL TIME*
9.91%

RYCKX

1D
2.48%
1M
-4.87%
6M
7.29%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*
7.23%
ALL TIME*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYMDX vs. RYCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMDX
Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund
19.50%5.29%15.46%19.11%-23.31%34.58%9.87%36.13%-19.37%22.67%
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
12.35%6.61%15.10%13.97%-23.05%11.26%29.72%14.60%-15.17%18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMDX and RYCKX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.95

The correlation between RYMDX and RYCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMDX vs. RYCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYMDX
RYMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
RYMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCKX
RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYMDX vs. RYCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMDX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYMDXRYCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.13

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.31

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

4.47

+2.02

RYMDX vs. RYCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the RYCKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMDX and RYCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYMDX vs. RYCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMDX drawdown since its inception was -75.43%, which is greater than RYCKX's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMDX and RYCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMDXRYCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.43%

-52.60%

-22.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.50%

-10.50%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.20%

-27.14%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.77%

-35.98%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.09%

-44.75%

-13.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.79%

-7.89%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.36%

-9.47%

-5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.16%

+0.71%

Volatility

RYMDX vs. RYCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMDX) is 5.28%, while Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that RYMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMDXRYCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

6.19%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.45%

16.24%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

19.70%

+3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.41%

22.97%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.54%

23.11%

+9.43%

RYMDX vs. RYCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMDX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCKX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMDX vs. RYCKX - Dividend Comparison

RYMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.92%0.00%14.34%13.66%1.29%0.00%18.93%7.60%1.72%5.90%
RYMDX
Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund
0.61%0.73%0.72%0.35%0.00%17.47%0.38%0.18%0.56%0.53%0.19%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, RYMDX and RYCKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RYCKX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to RYMDX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMDX dropped -75.43% vs RYCKX's -52.60%.

RYMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMDX and RYCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer