PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLIX vs. FSAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYLIX vs. FSAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Leisure Fund (RYLIX) and Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLIX achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than FSAVX's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, RYLIX has underperformed FSAVX with an annualized return of 6.60%, while FSAVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.


RYLIX

1D
-1.26%
1M
0.75%
YTD
-5.22%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
-2.27%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
6.60%

FSAVX

1D
0.32%
1M
3.94%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
-7.03%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYLIX vs. FSAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYLIX
Rydex Leisure Fund
-5.22%8.99%17.03%22.86%-26.98%0.91%21.26%29.89%-13.22%20.52%
FSAVX
Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio
-0.98%8.01%6.15%32.55%-37.45%28.99%63.22%28.87%-13.78%24.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RYLIX and FSAVX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.76

The correlation between RYLIX and FSAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYLIX vs. FSAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYLIX
RYLIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
RYLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FSAVX
FSAVX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FSAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYLIX vs. FSAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Leisure Fund (RYLIX) and Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYLIXFSAVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.14

0.18

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.09

0.38

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.05

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

0.19

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.30

0.46

-0.77

RYLIX vs. FSAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the FSAVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLIX and FSAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYLIXFSAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

0.18

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.05

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.46

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.39

-0.16

Drawdowns

RYLIX vs. FSAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLIX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, smaller than the maximum FSAVX drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLIX and FSAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLIXFSAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.20%

-81.27%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-19.11%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-19.11%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.12%

-41.86%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.27%

-43.28%

+1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.62%

-10.63%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-13.37%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

7.87%

-1.62%

Volatility

RYLIX vs. FSAVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Leisure Fund (RYLIX) is 4.03%, while Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that RYLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYLIXFSAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

6.08%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

16.42%

-6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

20.44%

-6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

23.75%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.06%

24.05%

-3.99%

RYLIX vs. FSAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAVX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYLIX vs. FSAVX - Dividend Comparison

RYLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FSAVX's 5.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAVX
Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio
5.73%0.00%0.85%0.86%2.61%2.58%8.57%4.08%7.97%15.51%7.13%16.06%
RYLIX
Rydex Leisure Fund
0.06%0.06%0.43%0.06%0.00%6.14%0.00%0.24%8.04%6.23%0.49%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYLIX and FSAVX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSAVX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to RYLIX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLIX dropped -68.20% vs FSAVX's -81.27%.

FSAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYLIX and FSAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer