PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYKIX vs. FIDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYKIX vs. FIDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Banking Fund (RYKIX) and John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYKIX achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than FIDAX's 2.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RYKIX having a 11.10% annualized return and FIDAX not far ahead at 11.20%.


RYKIX

1D
1.22%
1M
6.66%
YTD
9.32%
6M
7.31%
1Y
30.68%
3Y*
28.41%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
11.10%

FIDAX

1D
0.87%
1M
3.40%
YTD
2.64%
6M
0.94%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYKIX vs. FIDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYKIX
Rydex Banking Fund
9.32%23.92%23.33%2.95%-16.81%33.70%-7.85%28.51%-19.19%12.47%
FIDAX
John Hancock Financial Industries Fund
2.64%12.05%30.09%5.01%-14.17%28.80%1.58%31.21%-15.30%11.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RYKIX and FIDAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.93

The correlation between RYKIX and FIDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYKIX vs. FIDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYKIX
RYKIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RYKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RYKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FIDAX
FIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYKIX vs. FIDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Banking Fund (RYKIX) and John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYKIXFIDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

0.96

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

2.68

+3.57

RYKIX vs. FIDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYKIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the FIDAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYKIX and FIDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYKIX vs. FIDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYKIX drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, which is greater than FIDAX's maximum drawdown of -70.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYKIX and FIDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYKIXFIDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.14%

-70.42%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.25%

-13.82%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.79%

-19.35%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.99%

-30.89%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.08%

-42.09%

-8.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.85%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.41%

-14.05%

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

4.95%

+0.33%

Volatility

RYKIX vs. FIDAX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Banking Fund (RYKIX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) at 4.34%. This indicates that RYKIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYKIXFIDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.34%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

12.52%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.17%

16.15%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

20.66%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.03%

21.98%

+6.05%

RYKIX vs. FIDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYKIX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYKIX vs. FIDAX - Dividend Comparison

RYKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than FIDAX's 46.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDAX
John Hancock Financial Industries Fund
46.95%48.19%10.24%1.91%11.22%23.08%5.41%7.56%7.72%6.10%6.01%0.93%
RYKIX
Rydex Banking Fund
3.04%3.32%3.29%1.46%3.11%0.48%2.90%0.59%2.32%0.36%0.41%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, RYKIX and FIDAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RYKIX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to FIDAX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYKIX dropped -80.14% vs FIDAX's -70.42%.

RYKIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYKIX and FIDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer