PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYDVX vs. KMVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYDVX vs. KMVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX) and Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYDVX achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than KMVAX's 13.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RYDVX has underperformed KMVAX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while KMVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


RYDVX

1D
-0.84%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
7.82%
6M
7.33%
1Y
21.11%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
10.55%

KMVAX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
13.83%
6M
10.57%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
22.31%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYDVX vs. KMVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYDVX
Royce Dividend Value Fund
7.82%9.44%19.41%23.29%-13.63%20.00%4.45%30.00%-16.33%21.39%
KMVAX
Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund
13.83%14.44%27.82%20.42%-16.01%28.83%2.96%27.03%-19.72%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RYDVX and KMVAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.90

The correlation between RYDVX and KMVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYDVX vs. KMVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYDVX
RYDVX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RYDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RYDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

KMVAX
KMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
KMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYDVX vs. KMVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX) and Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYDVXKMVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.15

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

5.88

-1.08

RYDVX vs. KMVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYDVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the KMVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYDVX and KMVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYDVXKMVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.42

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.72

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.42

+0.02

Drawdowns

RYDVX vs. KMVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYDVX drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, smaller than the maximum KMVAX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYDVX and KMVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYDVXKMVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-65.81%

+12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-10.22%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.45%

-21.26%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.35%

-24.84%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.49%

-45.41%

+3.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.12%

-1.21%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.54%

-9.98%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

3.74%

+0.54%

Volatility

RYDVX vs. KMVAX - Volatility Comparison

Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX) at 4.10%. This indicates that RYDVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYDVXKMVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

4.10%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

11.76%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

15.56%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

18.39%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

20.14%

-0.43%

RYDVX vs. KMVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYDVX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than KMVAX's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYDVX vs. KMVAX - Dividend Comparison

RYDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 171.59%, more than KMVAX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMVAX
Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund
4.65%5.30%7.58%3.35%3.57%3.72%1.35%2.11%9.38%6.87%5.64%0.34%
RYDVX
Royce Dividend Value Fund
171.59%185.21%21.24%11.80%0.57%14.07%5.55%15.61%14.15%14.26%10.48%11.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYDVX and KMVAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYDVX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to KMVAX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYDVX dropped -53.36% vs KMVAX's -65.81%.

KMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYDVX and KMVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer