RYCQX vs. UWPIX
RYCQX (Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund) and UWPIX (ProFunds UltraShort Dow 30 Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYCQX returned -12.28%/yr vs -25.68%/yr for UWPIX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYCQX charges 2.49%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for UWPIX.
Performance
RYCQX vs. UWPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RYCQX having a -15.49% return and UWPIX slightly lower at -15.91%. Over the past 10 years, RYCQX has outperformed UWPIX with an annualized return of -12.28%, while UWPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -25.68% annualized return.
RYCQX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- -11.35%
- 5Y*
- -6.76%
- 10Y*
- -12.28%
UWPIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- -15.91%
- 1Y
- -28.05%
- 3Y*
- -23.85%
- 5Y*
- -17.19%
- 10Y*
- -25.68%
RYCQX vs. UWPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCQX Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund | -15.49% | -9.40% | -6.15% | -10.73% | 16.50% | -18.59% | -31.59% | -20.84% | 10.41% | -14.20% |
UWPIX ProFunds UltraShort Dow 30 Fund | -15.91% | -23.48% | -20.75% | -18.56% | 5.91% | -35.49% | -45.69% | -36.17% | 1.45% | -39.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCQX and UWPIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.80 |
The correlation between RYCQX and UWPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCQX vs. UWPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RYCQX
UWPIX
RYCQX vs. UWPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX) and ProFunds UltraShort Dow 30 Fund (UWPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYCQX | UWPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.86 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.54 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYCQX vs. UWPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCQX drawdown since its inception was -96.16%, roughly equal to the maximum UWPIX drawdown of -99.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCQX and UWPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCQX | UWPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.16% | -99.79% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -31.18% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.85% | -62.72% | +19.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.88% | -70.10% | +27.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.27% | -95.20% | +20.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.08% | -99.78% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.65% | -77.75% | +7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.55% | 17.28% | -1.73% |
Volatility
RYCQX vs. UWPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX) is 3.84%, while ProFunds UltraShort Dow 30 Fund (UWPIX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that RYCQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UWPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYCQX | UWPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 4.87% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | 19.59% | -5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 24.65% | -5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 30.03% | -6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 34.92% | -11.10% |
RYCQX vs. UWPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYCQX has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than UWPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYCQX vs. UWPIX - Dividend Comparison
RYCQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than UWPIX's 5.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCQX Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund | 9.31% | 7.87% | 7.14% | 9.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.86% |
UWPIX ProFunds UltraShort Dow 30 Fund | 5.37% | 4.51% | 0.00% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYCQX and UWPIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UWPIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to RYCQX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCQX dropped -96.16% vs UWPIX's -99.79%.
UWPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.08 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYCQX and UWPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer