PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCIX vs. RYCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYCIX vs. RYCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Consumer Products Fund (RYCIX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCIX achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than RYCKX's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCIX has underperformed RYCKX with an annualized return of 4.09%, while RYCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.23% annualized return.


RYCIX

1D
-1.72%
1M
-0.14%
6M
3.22%
YTD
9.92%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
4.09%
ALL TIME*
6.11%

RYCKX

1D
2.48%
1M
-4.87%
6M
7.29%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
4.05%
10Y*
7.23%
ALL TIME*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYCIX vs. RYCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCIX
Rydex Consumer Products Fund
9.92%-2.99%4.97%-2.81%-0.42%11.09%8.26%22.81%-11.80%11.94%
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
12.35%6.61%15.10%13.97%-23.05%11.26%29.72%14.60%-15.17%18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCIX and RYCKX is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.60

The correlation between RYCIX and RYCKX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCIX vs. RYCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYCIX
RYCIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
RYCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCKX
RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYCIX vs. RYCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Consumer Products Fund (RYCIX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYCIXRYCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.13

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

1.31

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.42

4.47

-4.04

RYCIX vs. RYCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the RYCKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCIX and RYCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCIX vs. RYCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCIX drawdown since its inception was -38.96%, smaller than the maximum RYCKX drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCIX and RYCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCIXRYCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.96%

-52.60%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-10.50%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.96%

-27.14%

+14.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.66%

-35.98%

+20.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.44%

-44.75%

+16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-7.89%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.30%

-9.47%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.81%

3.16%

+3.65%

Volatility

RYCIX vs. RYCKX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Consumer Products Fund (RYCIX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) have volatilities of 5.92% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCIXRYCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

6.19%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

16.24%

-5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

19.70%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

22.97%

-8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

23.11%

-7.70%

RYCIX vs. RYCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYCIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCKX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYCIX vs. RYCKX - Dividend Comparison

RYCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.04%, while RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCIX
Rydex Consumer Products Fund
16.04%17.64%6.59%11.37%7.18%14.76%8.33%2.64%7.21%8.01%1.39%2.08%
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.92%0.00%14.34%13.66%1.29%0.00%18.93%7.60%1.72%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCIX and RYCKX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCKX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to RYCIX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCIX dropped -38.96% vs RYCKX's -52.60%.

RYCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCIX and RYCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer