RXRX vs. BEAM
RXRX (Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and BEAM (Beam Therapeutics Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 5 years, RXRX returned -33.81%/yr vs -18.35%/yr for BEAM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RXRX vs. BEAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXRX achieves a -11.74% return, which is significantly lower than BEAM's 4.47% return.
RXRX
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- -11.74%
- 6M
- -16.44%
- 1Y
- -17.39%
- 3Y*
- -24.02%
- 5Y*
- -33.81%
- 10Y*
- —
BEAM
- 1D
- -7.00%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 23.92%
- 1Y
- 78.88%
- 3Y*
- -5.24%
- 5Y*
- -18.35%
- 10Y*
- —
RXRX vs. BEAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXRX Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -11.74% | -39.50% | -31.44% | 27.89% | -54.99% | -45.27% |
BEAM Beam Therapeutics Inc. | 4.47% | 11.77% | -8.89% | -30.40% | -50.92% | 9.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXRX and BEAM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between RXRX and BEAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
RXRX:
$1.91B
BEAM:
$2.99B
RXRX:
-$1.17
BEAM:
-$0.63
RXRX:
26.15
BEAM:
22.59
RXRX:
1.86
BEAM:
2.57
RXRX:
$66.29M
BEAM:
$132.27M
RXRX:
-$22.83M
BEAM:
-$84.92M
RXRX:
-$505.90M
BEAM:
-$68.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXRX vs. BEAM — Risk / Return Rank
RXRX
BEAM
RXRX vs. BEAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) and Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RXRX | BEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | 1.07 | -1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.16 | 2.02 | -1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.22 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.17 | -2.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 4.72 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RXRX | BEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 1.07 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.24 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.09 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
RXRX vs. BEAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXRX drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, roughly equal to the maximum BEAM drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXRX and BEAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXRX | BEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.13% | -89.12% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.17% | -38.15% | -20.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.09% | -67.74% | -14.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.13% | -89.12% | -4.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.27% | -78.32% | -12.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.33% | -59.80% | -15.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.04% | 17.57% | +17.47% |
Volatility
RXRX vs. BEAM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) is 18.74%, while Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) has a volatility of 21.75%. This indicates that RXRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXRX | BEAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.74% | 21.75% | -3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.79% | 53.51% | -8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.46% | 73.87% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.46% | 75.70% | +17.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.62% | 80.33% | +13.29% |
Dividends
RXRX vs. BEAM - Dividend Comparison
Neither RXRX nor BEAM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RXRX vs. BEAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Beam Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RXRX and BEAM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEAM has higher volatility (21.75%) compared to RXRX (18.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXRX dropped -93.13% vs BEAM's -89.12%.
BEAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXRX and BEAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer