PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RXD vs. ERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RXD vs. ERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXD achieves a -10.24% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 71.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RXD has underperformed ERX with an annualized return of -19.63%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively higher -8.11% annualized return.


RXD

1D
0.47%
1M
0.46%
6M
-10.79%
YTD
-10.24%
1Y
-35.49%
3Y*
-10.24%
5Y*
-7.59%
10Y*
-19.63%
ALL TIME*
-22.75%

ERX

1D
1.98%
1M
23.93%
6M
32.46%
YTD
71.01%
1Y
85.96%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
35.70%
10Y*
-8.11%
ALL TIME*
-6.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.14M$22.35M$28.47M
$208.34K$158.30K$97.64K

RXD vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RXD
ProShares UltraShort Health Care
-10.24%-21.66%4.83%3.25%1.20%-37.97%-44.25%-32.44%-14.33%-35.24%
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
71.01%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between RXD and ERX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

-0.36

The correlation between RXD and ERX shifts across timeframes, from -0.36 (all time) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RXD vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RXD
RXD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
RXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RXD vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RXDERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.29

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

2.65

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

6.74

-8.14

RXD vs. ERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXD Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the ERX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXD and ERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RXD vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXD drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, roughly equal to the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXD and ERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RXDERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.68%

-99.54%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.79%

-29.97%

-10.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.58%

-42.34%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.11%

-46.90%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.52%

-98.59%

+7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.67%

-91.37%

-8.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.00%

-67.24%

-14.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.78%

11.83%

+13.95%

Volatility

RXD vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) have volatilities of 11.80% and 11.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RXDERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.80%

11.87%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.09%

33.76%

-9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.60%

42.31%

-10.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.35%

51.50%

-21.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.15%

68.84%

-35.69%

RXD vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ERX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

RXD vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison

RXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than ERX's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.49%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%
RXD
ProShares UltraShort Health Care
3.31%3.29%4.36%3.17%0.67%0.00%0.17%1.73%0.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RXD and ERX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (11.87%) compared to RXD (11.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXD dropped -99.68% vs ERX's -99.54%.

On 10-year performance, ERX leads with -8.11% vs -19.63% for RXD. On fees, ERX is cheaper at 0.91% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ERX has performed better with a -8.11% return vs -19.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ERX is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXD.

RXD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.49% for ERX.

RXD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ERX is Energy Equities. RXD tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Health Care -IND (-200%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RXD and 0.91% for ERX.

ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RXD and ERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer