RWR vs. XLI
RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RWR is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWR returned 5.69%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for XLI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
RWR vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than XLI's 13.90% return. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed XLI with an annualized return of 5.69%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.
RWR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
RWR vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 16.67% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | -11.40% | 22.71% | -4.47% | 3.47% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWR and XLI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2001 | 0.57 |
The correlation between RWR and XLI shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RWR vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWR
XLI
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
RWR
XLI
-
Financial Services
RWR
XLI
-
Utilities
RWR
XLI
Basic Materials
RWR
-
XLI
-
Communication Services
RWR
-
XLI
-
Consumer Cyclical
RWR
-
XLI
Consumer Defensive
RWR
-
XLI
-
Energy
RWR
-
XLI
-
Healthcare
RWR
-
XLI
-
Industrials
RWR
-
XLI
Technology
RWR
-
XLI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWR vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
RWR
XLI
RWR vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWR | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.98 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 7.82 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWR vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than XLI's maximum drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWR | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.92% | -62.26% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -12.21% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -18.49% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -21.64% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.39% | -42.33% | -2.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.24% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -9.20% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 3.09% | -0.73% |
Volatility
RWR vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is 4.93%, while Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that RWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWR | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 6.22% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 13.59% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 16.17% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 17.55% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 20.04% | +1.48% |
RWR vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RWR vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.27% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWR and XLI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to RWR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 5.69% for RWR. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.
RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
RWR is categorized as REIT, while XLI is Industrials Equities. RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.08% for XLI.
XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWR and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer