PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWR vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWR vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 5.15%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.


RWR

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
11.08%
6M
9.50%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
5.15%

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
11.08%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and VEA is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.57

The correlation between RWR and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RWR vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWR
VEA

Real Estate

98.6%
2.7%

Financial Services

0.0%
23.3%

Utilities

0.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

5.4%

Healthcare

-

8.2%

Industrials

-

19.2%

Technology

-

13.8%

Real Estate

RWR
98.6%
VEA
2.7%

Financial Services

RWR
0.0%
VEA
23.3%

Utilities

RWR
0.0%
VEA
3.3%

Basic Materials

RWR

-

VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

RWR

-

VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RWR

-

VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

RWR

-

VEA
5.6%

Energy

RWR

-

VEA
5.4%

Healthcare

RWR

-

VEA
8.2%

Industrials

RWR

-

VEA
19.2%

Technology

RWR

-

VEA
13.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWR vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWRVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.81

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

10.94

-4.39

RWR vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWRVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.09

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.58

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.59

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.25

+0.06

Drawdowns

RWR vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWRVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.92%

-60.68%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-11.63%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-13.45%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-29.71%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

-35.73%

-8.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-0.90%

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-13.29%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.98%

-0.62%

Volatility

RWR vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is 4.09%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that RWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWRVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

5.66%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

13.32%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

15.66%

-2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

16.55%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

17.36%

+4.15%

RWR vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RWR vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.44%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWR and VEA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to RWR (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.17% vs 5.15% for RWR. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 5.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

RWR is categorized as REIT, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWR and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer