RWDIX vs. PADZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RWDIX (Redwood Managed Volatility Fund) and PADZX (PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RWDIX returned 1.84%/yr vs 4.32%/yr for PADZX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RWDIX charges 1.56%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for PADZX.

Performance

RWDIX vs. PADZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWDIX achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than PADZX's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, RWDIX has underperformed PADZX with an annualized return of 1.84%, while PADZX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.32% annualized return.

RWDIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 6.07%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: 0.28%
• 10Y*: 1.84%

PADZX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 5.81%
• 3Y*: 6.49%
• 5Y*: 3.97%
• 10Y*: 4.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWDIX vs. PADZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWDIX Redwood Managed Volatility Fund	1.32%	4.75%	6.63%	1.04%	-11.18%	0.52%	-1.93%	9.04%	-2.60%	7.31%
PADZX PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund	2.29%	5.10%	7.48%	6.11%	-1.55%	1.87%	0.59%	11.10%	0.71%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RWDIX and PADZX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.22

The correlation between RWDIX and PADZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (5 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RWDIX vs. PADZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWDIX

RWDIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
RWDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RWDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RWDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
RWDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RWDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

PADZX

PADZX Risk / Return Rank: 96
PADZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PADZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PADZX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PADZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PADZX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWDIX vs. PADZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX) and PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWDIX	PADZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.78	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.48	6.26	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	2.86	-1.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	7.71	-4.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.12	40.05	-24.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWDIX vs. PADZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the PADZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWDIX and PADZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWDIX	PADZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	2.78	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	1.85	-1.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	1.37	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.20	-0.75

Drawdowns

RWDIX vs. PADZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWDIX drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, smaller than the maximum PADZX drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWDIX and PADZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWDIX	PADZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.69%	-17.99%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.95%	-0.76%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.96%	-0.98%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.10%	-4.05%	-12.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.69%	-17.99%	+1.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-0.76%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-0.95%	-3.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	0.15%	+0.26%

Volatility

RWDIX vs. PADZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Redwood Managed Volatility Fund (RWDIX) is 0.68%, while PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that RWDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PADZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWDIX	PADZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.68%	1.42%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.73%	1.77%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16%	2.10%	+0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.69%	2.16%	+2.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	3.16%	+1.14%

RWDIX vs. PADZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWDIX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PADZX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWDIX vs. PADZX - Dividend Comparison

RWDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, less than PADZX's 5.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PADZX PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund	5.08%	5.07%	5.18%	4.09%	2.89%	2.40%	3.41%	10.79%	5.02%	2.75%	2.36%	2.38%
RWDIX Redwood Managed Volatility Fund	4.97%	4.90%	5.82%	7.60%	0.47%	6.36%	5.42%	3.59%	2.59%	5.52%	5.14%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWDIX and PADZX in my portfolio?

RWDIX and PADZX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWDIX or PADZX?

PADZX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to RWDIX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWDIX dropped -16.69% vs PADZX's -17.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.