PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWAY vs. PAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RWAY vs. PAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RWAY vs. PAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RWAY
Runway Growth Finance Corp.
-19.71%-6.56%1.65%4.75%
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
0.99%5.37%7.47%3.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWAY achieves a -19.71% return, which is significantly lower than PAAA's 0.99% return.


RWAY

1D
0.73%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
-19.71%
6M
-26.98%
1Y
-23.21%
3Y*
-3.94%
5Y*
10Y*

PAAA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.99%
6M
2.21%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWAY vs. PAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWAY
RWAY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PAAA
PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWAY vs. PAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWAYPAAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.85

4.03

-4.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.08

4.87

-5.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

2.94

-2.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

5.26

-5.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.75

43.72

-45.47

RWAY vs. PAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the PAAA Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWAY and PAAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWAYPAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

4.03

-4.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

6.64

-6.66

Correlation

The correlation between RWAY and PAAA is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RWAY vs. PAAA - Dividend Comparison

RWAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.94%, more than PAAA's 5.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
RWAY
Runway Growth Finance Corp.
19.94%15.68%16.33%14.34%10.87%1.95%
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
5.48%5.12%5.88%2.76%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RWAY vs. PAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWAY drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, which is greater than PAAA's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWAY and PAAA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RWAYPAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-1.04%

-33.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.83%

-1.04%

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.16%

0.00%

-32.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-0.02%

-9.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.44%

0.12%

+13.32%

Volatility

RWAY vs. PAAA - Volatility Comparison

Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) has a higher volatility of 12.47% compared to PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) at 0.27%. This indicates that RWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RWAYPAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.47%

0.27%

+12.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.81%

0.39%

+18.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.39%

1.34%

+26.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.37%

1.00%

+27.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.37%

1.00%

+27.37%