RW vs. WAGN
RW (Rainwater Equity ETF) and WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RW charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for WAGN.
Performance
RW vs. WAGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RW
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- -2.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.19%
WAGN
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $44.56K | $41.45K | $44.87K | |
| $2.64M | $2.26M | $2.19M |
RW vs. WAGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RW Rainwater Equity ETF | 0.14% |
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between RW and WAGN is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RW vs. WAGN — Risk / Return Rank
RW
WAGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RW vs. WAGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rainwater Equity ETF (RW) and Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RW | WAGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RW vs. WAGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RW drawdown since its inception was -17.04%, which is greater than WAGN's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RW and WAGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RW | WAGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -1.36% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | 0.00% | -4.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -0.56% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | — | — |
Volatility
RW vs. WAGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RW | WAGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 12.55% | +3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 12.55% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 12.55% | +2.93% |
RW vs. WAGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
RW has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WAGN's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
RW vs. WAGN - Dividend Comparison
RW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while WAGN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RW Rainwater Equity ETF | 0.10% | 0.10% |
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RW and WAGN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAGN is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAGN is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for RW.
RW has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for WAGN.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Pabrai. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for RW and 0.90% for WAGN.
Find the right allocation for RW and WAGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer