RVI vs. AVGV

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

RVI (Robinhood Ventures Fund I) is a stock, while AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) is Global Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RVI vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Robinhood Ventures Fund I (RVI) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RVI

• 1D: -10.93%
• 1M: 16.88%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVGV

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -0.47%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 16.14%
• 1Y: 34.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVI vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RVI Robinhood Ventures Fund I	78.10%
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RVI and AVGV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026	0.18

Return for Risk

RVI vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGV

AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 83
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVI vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robinhood Ventures Fund I (RVI) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RVI	AVGV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.44	1.40	+5.04

Drawdowns

RVI vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVI drawdown since its inception was -49.26%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVI and AVGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVI	AVGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.26%	-17.03%	-32.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.26%	-2.21%	-47.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.50%	-2.29%	-12.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RVI	AVGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	154.22%	13.13%	+141.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	154.22%	15.01%	+139.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	154.22%	15.01%	+139.21%

Dividends

RVI vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison

RVI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	1.92%	1.98%	2.32%	1.14%
RVI Robinhood Ventures Fund I	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVI and AVGV in my portfolio?

RVI and AVGV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.