RUSB.TO vs. RCDC.TO
RUSB.TO (RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF) and RCDC.TO (RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RUSB.TO is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by RBC, while RCDC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RUSB.TO returned 7.53%/yr vs 20.31%/yr for RCDC.TO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
RUSB.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUSB.TO achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than RCDC.TO's 18.28% return.
RUSB.TO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- —
RCDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 17.00%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RUSB.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSB.TO RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 3.34% | 1.61% | 13.88% | 3.26% |
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 18.28% | 19.29% | 17.27% | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUSB.TO and RCDC.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between RUSB.TO and RCDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (3 years) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUSB.TO vs. RCDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RUSB.TO
RCDC.TO
RUSB.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.TO) and RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RUSB.TO | RCDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.74 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 6.06 | -4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 30.18 | -26.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RUSB.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.28%, which is greater than RCDC.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSB.TO and RCDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUSB.TO | RCDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.28% | -10.88% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.60% | -5.43% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.26% | -10.88% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | 0.00% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -1.82% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 1.09% | +0.55% |
Volatility
RUSB.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.TO) and RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF (RCDC.TO) have volatilities of 2.05% and 2.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUSB.TO | RCDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 2.10% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.25% | 6.71% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.45% | 8.45% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 10.08% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 10.08% | -3.12% |
Dividends
RUSB.TO vs. RCDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
RUSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than RCDC.TO's 6.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCDC.TO RBC Canadian Dividend Covered Call ETF | 6.15% | 6.38% | 6.46% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RUSB.TO RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 4.13% | 3.96% | 3.38% | 3.26% | 2.48% | 2.30% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 1.90% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RUSB.TO and RCDC.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RUSB.TO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while RCDC.TO is Derivative Income.
Find the right allocation for RUSB.TO and RCDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer