RUP.TO vs. ENLT
Compare and contrast key facts about Rupert Resources Ltd (RUP.TO) and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT).
Performance
RUP.TO vs. ENLT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RUP.TO vs. ENLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RUP.TO Rupert Resources Ltd | -0.46% | 52.72% | 9.02% | -20.33% |
ENLT Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares | 52.18% | 151.52% | -2.16% | 7.03% |
Different Trading Currencies
RUP.TO is traded in CAD, while ENLT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ENLT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
RUP.TO:
CA$1.51B
ENLT:
$9.72B
RUP.TO:
-CA$0.04
ENLT:
$1.21
RUP.TO:
5.47
ENLT:
1.84
RUP.TO:
CA$0.00
ENLT:
$766.35M
RUP.TO:
-CA$749.30K
ENLT:
$417.07M
RUP.TO:
-CA$9.27M
ENLT:
$715.90M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUP.TO achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than ENLT's 52.18% return.
RUP.TO
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- -19.93%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 12.81%
- 1Y
- 56.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 33.05%
ENLT
- 1D
- 6.09%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 52.18%
- 6M
- 118.86%
- 1Y
- 308.33%
- 3Y*
- 60.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUP.TO vs. ENLT — Risk / Return Rank
RUP.TO
ENLT
RUP.TO vs. ENLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rupert Resources Ltd (RUP.TO) and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RUP.TO | ENLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 6.25 | -5.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 5.21 | -3.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.68 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 20.20 | -18.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 64.49 | -59.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RUP.TO | ENLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 6.25 | -5.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 1.32 | -1.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between RUP.TO and ENLT is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RUP.TO vs. ENLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither RUP.TO nor ENLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
RUP.TO vs. ENLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUP.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than ENLT's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUP.TO and ENLT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUP.TO | ENLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -39.32% | -59.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -17.98% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.93% | -12.89% | -7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.72% | -12.35% | -44.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 4.97% | +5.50% |
Volatility
RUP.TO vs. ENLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rupert Resources Ltd (RUP.TO) is 15.85%, while Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares (ENLT) has a volatility of 20.68%. This indicates that RUP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RUP.TO | ENLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.85% | 20.68% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.00% | 39.73% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.67% | 49.79% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.15% | 42.66% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.56% | 42.66% | +18.90% |
Financials
RUP.TO vs. ENLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rupert Resources Ltd and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. Ordinary Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities