PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RULE vs. GYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RULE vs. GYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RULE vs. GYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
3.00%4.60%7.59%6.29%-22.87%1.03%
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
3.35%19.85%3.83%10.36%-7.73%0.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RULE achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than GYLD's 3.35% return.


RULE

1D
3.70%
1M
-8.05%
YTD
3.00%
6M
3.43%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
10Y*

GYLD

1D
1.29%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
3.35%
6M
6.86%
1Y
15.35%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
4.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RULE vs. GYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RULE has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GYLD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RULE vs. GYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RULE
RULE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GYLD
GYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RULE vs. GYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RULEGYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

1.19

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.61

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.87

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.61

7.27

-2.66

RULE vs. GYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RULE Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the GYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RULE and GYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RULEGYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.19

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.19

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between RULE and GYLD is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RULE vs. GYLD - Dividend Comparison

RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.78%8.43%12.90%7.13%4.64%5.50%7.42%5.83%8.17%6.78%7.29%10.35%

Drawdowns

RULE vs. GYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum GYLD drawdown of -55.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and GYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RULEGYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-55.03%

+24.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-8.10%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.41%

-2.19%

-7.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.51%

-14.58%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

2.09%

+1.12%

Volatility

RULE vs. GYLD - Volatility Comparison

Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) at 4.07%. This indicates that RULE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RULEGYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

4.07%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.07%

8.26%

+6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.24%

12.97%

+6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

13.57%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

16.59%

-2.70%