RULE vs. DWAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT).
RULE and DWAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RULE is an actively managed fund by Mohr Funds. It was launched on Nov 2, 2021. DWAT is an actively managed fund by Arrow Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2014.
Performance
RULE vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RULE vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RULE Adaptive Core ETF | -6.68% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical ETF | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
RULE
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RULE vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RULE has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RULE vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
RULE
DWAT
RULE vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RULE | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RULE | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | — | — |
Dividends
RULE vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither RULE nor DWAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RULE Adaptive Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.01% | 0.01% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RULE vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and DWAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RULE | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | 0.00% | -30.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.41% | 0.00% | -9.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.51% | 0.00% | -15.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility
RULE vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RULE | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.24% | 0.00% | +19.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 0.00% | +13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 0.00% | +13.89% |