PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RULE vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RULE vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RULE vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
-6.68%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical ETF
0.00%

Returns By Period


RULE

1D
3.70%
1M
-8.05%
YTD
3.00%
6M
3.43%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RULE vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RULE has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RULE vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RULE
RULE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RULE vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RULEDWATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.61

RULE vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RULEDWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

Dividends

RULE vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither RULE nor DWAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
RULE
Adaptive Core ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.01%0.01%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RULE vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and DWAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RULEDWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

0.00%

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.41%

0.00%

-9.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.51%

0.00%

-15.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

Volatility

RULE vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RULEDWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.24%

0.00%

+19.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

0.00%

+13.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

0.00%

+13.89%