RTXAX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
RTXAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 9, 2019. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
RTXAX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTXAX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 11.49% | 13.56% | 1.50% | 7.40% | -11.66% | 26.57% | 3.73% | 6.17% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 6.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTXAX achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than CSUAX's 8.35% return.
RTXAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTXAX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTXAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RTXAX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
RTXAX
CSUAX
RTXAX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTXAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | 1.63 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.17 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 2.36 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 10.32 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTXAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.63 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTXAX and CSUAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RTXAX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
RTXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 2.57% | 2.86% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 3.11% | 1.74% | 1.71% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
RTXAX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTXAX drawdown since its inception was -40.68%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXAX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTXAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.68% | -52.20% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -7.98% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.63% | -20.45% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -4.38% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -8.49% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.83% | +0.46% |
Volatility
RTXAX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that RTXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTXAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 3.26% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 6.89% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | 11.48% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 12.89% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 14.89% | +5.37% |