PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTSSX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTSSX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund (RTSSX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTSSX achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, RTSSX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.78% annualized return.


RTSSX

1D
1.73%
1M
4.51%
YTD
18.09%
6M
15.61%
1Y
32.25%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
9.64%

NASDX

1D
2.48%
1M
3.17%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.57%
1Y
41.12%
3Y*
30.69%
5Y*
19.33%
10Y*
22.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTSSX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTSSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund
18.09%5.24%7.21%16.62%-19.12%19.88%15.34%23.91%-8.63%14.71%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
20.41%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RTSSX and NASDX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2000

0.80

The correlation between RTSSX and NASDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTSSX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTSSX
RTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTSSX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund (RTSSX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTSSXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.42

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

12.86

-0.99

RTSSX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTSSX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTSSX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTSSX drawdown since its inception was -57.98%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTSSX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTSSXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.98%

-83.16%

+25.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-11.90%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-22.71%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-35.33%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.79%

-35.33%

-5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.80%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-34.31%

+22.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.16%

-0.44%

Volatility

RTSSX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund (RTSSX) is 5.58%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that RTSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTSSXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

8.48%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

14.35%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

17.71%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.65%

23.29%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

22.80%

-1.47%

RTSSX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTSSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTSSX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

RTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than NASDX's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
3.01%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%
RTSSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund
0.40%0.47%0.72%0.11%0.25%0.10%0.36%0.31%0.00%0.55%0.00%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTSSX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to RTSSX (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTSSX dropped -57.98% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTSSX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer