PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTSSX vs. DFFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTSSX vs. DFFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund (RTSSX) and DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTSSX achieves a 18.57% return, which is significantly higher than DFFVX's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, RTSSX has underperformed DFFVX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while DFFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.


RTSSX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.93%
YTD
18.57%
6M
16.48%
1Y
31.24%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
9.97%

DFFVX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.47%
YTD
15.95%
6M
14.28%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTSSX vs. DFFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTSSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund
18.57%5.24%7.21%16.62%-19.12%19.88%15.34%23.91%-8.63%14.71%
DFFVX
DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio
15.95%9.53%9.34%19.37%-4.66%31.53%3.78%21.51%-15.79%9.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RTSSX and DFFVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2000

0.94

The correlation between RTSSX and DFFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTSSX vs. DFFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTSSX
RTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DFFVX
DFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTSSX vs. DFFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund (RTSSX) and DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTSSXDFFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.45

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

11.19

+0.91

RTSSX vs. DFFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the DFFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTSSX and DFFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTSSX vs. DFFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTSSX drawdown since its inception was -57.98%, smaller than the maximum DFFVX drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTSSX and DFFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTSSXDFFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.98%

-64.21%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-9.70%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-26.09%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-26.09%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.79%

-50.75%

+9.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.41%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-9.69%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.98%

-0.26%

Volatility

RTSSX vs. DFFVX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund (RTSSX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) at 3.96%. This indicates that RTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTSSXDFFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

3.96%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

11.11%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

17.07%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.64%

21.47%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.34%

23.67%

-2.33%

RTSSX vs. DFFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTSSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DFFVX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTSSX vs. DFFVX - Dividend Comparison

RTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than DFFVX's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFFVX
DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio
1.48%1.69%1.40%2.26%5.17%2.74%1.52%3.82%5.95%5.16%3.95%5.84%
RTSSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Mid & Small Cap Fund
0.39%0.47%0.72%0.11%0.25%0.10%0.36%0.31%0.00%0.55%0.00%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, RTSSX and DFFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RTSSX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to DFFVX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTSSX dropped -57.98% vs DFFVX's -64.21%.

DFFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTSSX and DFFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer