PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTDYX vs. SVPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTDYX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTDYX achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.49% return.


RTDYX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.98%
YTD
12.13%
6M
11.89%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
14.44%

SVPFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTDYX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
12.13%16.05%22.01%24.92%-16.48%16.00%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
1.49%4.19%3.82%5.30%-4.37%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between RTDYX and SVPFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021

0.12

The correlation between RTDYX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (5 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTDYX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTDYX
RTDYX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RTDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RTDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SVPFX
SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTDYX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTDYXSVPFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

2.35

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

3.40

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.53

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.97

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.35

13.46

+2.89

RTDYX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTDYX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTDYXSVPFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.35

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.38

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.39

+0.22

Drawdowns

RTDYX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTDYX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTDYX and SVPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTDYXSVPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.43%

-6.37%

-31.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-1.33%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.43%

-5.32%

-32.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.43%

-6.37%

-31.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-0.20%

-3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-1.93%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

0.43%

+1.35%

Volatility

RTDYX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.67%. This indicates that RTDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTDYXSVPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

0.67%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

1.47%

+7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

2.26%

+9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.41%

5.60%

+18.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.11%

5.51%

+16.60%

RTDYX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTDYX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTDYX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

RTDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.18%, more than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
31.18%35.18%31.60%4.66%6.03%6.51%3.44%6.62%11.47%7.65%1.79%2.57%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
2.47%1.83%4.37%4.29%0.76%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTDYX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTDYX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to SVPFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTDYX dropped -37.43% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

RTDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTDYX and SVPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer