RTDYX vs. FLCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX).
RTDYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Jul 31, 2014. FLCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 2, 2016.
Performance
RTDYX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTDYX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTDYX Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund | -6.17% | 16.05% | 22.01% | 24.92% | -16.48% | 27.22% | 13.88% | 30.27% | -7.16% | 21.59% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | -7.05% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 28.61% | 18.24% | 31.59% | -4.38% | 21.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTDYX achieves a -6.17% return, which is significantly higher than FLCPX's -7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RTDYX has underperformed FLCPX with an annualized return of 12.61%, while FLCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.
RTDYX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
FLCPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTDYX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTDYX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RTDYX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank
RTDYX
FLCPX
RTDYX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTDYX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.00 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 4.86 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTDYX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.67 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.76 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.82 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTDYX and FLCPX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RTDYX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison
RTDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.49%, more than FLCPX's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTDYX Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund | 37.49% | 35.18% | 31.60% | 4.66% | 6.03% | 6.51% | 3.44% | 6.62% | 11.47% | 7.65% | 1.79% | 2.57% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.60% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RTDYX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTDYX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTDYX and FLCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTDYX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.43% | -33.87% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -12.14% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.43% | -24.40% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.43% | -33.87% | -3.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.25% | -8.89% | -10.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -4.24% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.56% | -0.07% |
Volatility
RTDYX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) have volatilities of 4.16% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTDYX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.24% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 9.09% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 18.14% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 17.03% | +7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 18.12% | +3.96% |