RSSL vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSSL (Global X Russell 2000 ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSSL is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RSSL returned 43.38% vs 4.63% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. RSSL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

RSSL vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSL achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.38% return.

RSSL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 18.48%
• 6M: 19.47%
• 1Y: 43.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.38%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSL vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	18.48%	12.87%	8.83%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	2.38%	5.66%	3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSL and IBID is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	-0.07

Return for Risk

RSSL vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSL

RSSL Risk / Return Rank: 68
RSSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RSSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RSSL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RSSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RSSL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 96
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSL vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSSL	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	3.73	-1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	6.39	-3.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.88	-0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	12.77	-8.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	37.57	-23.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSSL vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSL Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSL and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSSL	IBID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	3.73	-1.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	2.55	-1.62

Drawdowns

RSSL vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSL drawdown since its inception was -27.79%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSL and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSL	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.79%	-1.28%	-26.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	-0.36%	-10.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-0.22%	-5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	0.12%	+2.98%

Volatility

RSSL vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that RSSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSL	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	0.32%	+5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.49%	0.80%	+12.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.11%	1.25%	+17.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.46%	2.26%	+20.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	2.26%	+20.20%

RSSL vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

RSSL vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

RSSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than IBID's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.67%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	1.27%	1.35%	0.99%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSL and IBID in my portfolio?

RSSL and IBID have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSSL or IBID?

RSSL has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSL dropped -27.79% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, RSSL or IBID?

On 1-year performance, RSSL leads with 43.38% vs 4.63% for IBID. On fees, RSSL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSL or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, RSSL has performed better with a 43.38% return vs 4.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSL or IBID?

RSSL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSL or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 1.27% for RSSL.

What is the main difference between RSSL and IBID?

RSSL is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. RSSL tracks Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for RSSL and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.