RSSL vs. AVSC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

RSSL (Global X Russell 2000 ETF) and AVSC (Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. RSSL is passively managed, while AVSC is actively managed. Over the past year, RSSL returned 35.14% vs 40.31% for AVSC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSSL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVSC.

Performance

RSSL vs. AVSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSL achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly lower than AVSC's 25.77% return.

RSSL

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 12.00%
• YTD: 20.61%
• 1Y: 35.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVSC

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 4.22%
• 6M: 16.71%
• YTD: 25.77%
• 1Y: 40.31%
• 3Y*: 17.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSL vs. AVSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	20.61%	12.87%	10.21%
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF	25.77%	9.42%	8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSL and AVSC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.94

The correlation between RSSL and AVSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSSL vs. AVSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSL

RSSL Risk / Return Rank: 72
RSSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RSSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RSSL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RSSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RSSL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

AVSC

AVSC Risk / Return Rank: 88
AVSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AVSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
AVSC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AVSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AVSC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSL vs. AVSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSL	AVSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	2.29	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	3.29	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	5.13	-1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	16.14	-4.82

RSSL vs. AVSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSL Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the AVSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSL and AVSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSSL vs. AVSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSL drawdown since its inception was -27.79%, roughly equal to the maximum AVSC drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSL and AVSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSL	AVSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.79%	-28.40%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	-7.89%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	0.00%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-7.26%	+1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	2.50%	+0.61%

Volatility

RSSL vs. AVSC - Volatility Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSL	AVSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	3.54%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	11.93%	+2.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.31%	17.71%	+1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.23%	22.17%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.23%	22.17%	+0.06%

RSSL vs. AVSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AVSC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

RSSL vs. AVSC - Dividend Comparison

RSSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than AVSC's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF	0.91%	1.16%	1.17%	1.42%	1.10%
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	1.22%	1.35%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSL and AVSC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RSSL and AVSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RSSL or AVSC?

RSSL has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to AVSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSL dropped -27.79% vs AVSC's -28.40%.

Which ETF is better, RSSL or AVSC?

On 1-year performance, AVSC leads with 40.31% vs 35.14% for RSSL. On fees, RSSL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSL or AVSC?

Over the 1-year period, AVSC has performed better with a 40.31% return vs 35.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSL or AVSC?

RSSL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSL or AVSC?

RSSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.91% for AVSC.

What is the main difference between RSSL and AVSC?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Avantis Investors. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for RSSL and 0.25% for AVSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.