PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPR vs. VRAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPR vs. VRAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than VRAI's 20.17% return.


RSPR

1D
1.27%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.68%
6M
11.84%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
6.30%

VRAI

1D
0.52%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
20.17%
6M
20.99%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPR vs. VRAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
10.68%-1.88%8.61%11.59%-25.16%49.61%-2.90%10.98%
VRAI
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF
20.17%6.67%2.66%6.12%-9.96%24.35%-5.94%6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and VRAI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019

0.71

The correlation between RSPR and VRAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPR vs. VRAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VRAI
VRAI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VRAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VRAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. VRAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPRVRAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

4.71

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

14.54

-12.90

RSPR vs. VRAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the VRAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and VRAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. VRAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum VRAI drawdown of -47.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and VRAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPRVRAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-47.51%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-4.82%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-16.89%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

-26.71%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-2.34%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-10.03%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

1.56%

+2.39%

Volatility

RSPR vs. VRAI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Virtus Real Asset Income ETF (VRAI) at 3.28%. This indicates that RSPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPRVRAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

3.28%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

8.29%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.59%

11.99%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

16.61%

+2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

22.07%

-0.65%

RSPR vs. VRAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than VRAI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPR vs. VRAI - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than VRAI's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.84%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%
VRAI
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF
2.92%4.68%7.13%5.02%4.48%3.34%3.91%2.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPR and VRAI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPR has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to VRAI (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs VRAI's -47.51%.

On 5-year performance, VRAI leads with 5.71% vs 2.90% for RSPR. On fees, RSPR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, VRAI has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VRAI has performed better with a 5.71% return vs 2.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for VRAI.

VRAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.84% for RSPR.

RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while VRAI tracks Indxx Real Asset Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.55% for VRAI.

VRAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPR and VRAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer