PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPR vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPR vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 74.43% return.


RSPR

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.07%
6M
10.58%
YTD
11.24%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
5.71%

SOXQ

1D
-4.86%
1M
-7.72%
6M
61.03%
YTD
74.43%
1Y
117.47%
3Y*
49.64%
5Y*
31.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPR vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
11.24%-1.88%8.61%11.59%-25.16%14.49%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
74.43%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%25.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and SOXQ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPR and SOXQ has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPR vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPRSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.43

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

7.42

-6.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

23.55

-21.73

RSPR vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPRSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-46.01%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-15.92%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-39.36%

+21.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

-46.01%

+12.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-15.65%

+13.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-12.84%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

5.01%

-1.04%

Volatility

RSPR vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 4.98%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 21.73%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPRSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

21.73%

-16.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

35.36%

-24.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

41.31%

-26.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

37.85%

-18.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.39%

37.61%

-16.22%

RSPR vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPR vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than SOXQ's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.83%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.29%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPR and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (21.73%) compared to RSPR (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 31.46% vs 2.39% for RSPR. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 31.46% return vs 2.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.

RSPR has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.29% for SOXQ.

RSPR is categorized as REIT, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPR and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer