PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPR vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSPR vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSPR vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
-0.36%-1.88%8.61%11.59%-25.16%49.61%-2.90%24.62%-4.11%8.76%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.05%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPR has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 5.36%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.67% annualized return.


RSPR

1D
1.38%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-4.86%
1Y
-4.41%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
5.36%

BND

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
1.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPR vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSPR vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPRBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.26

0.99

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.24

1.41

-1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.18

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

1.81

-2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

4.98

-5.81

RSPR vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPRBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

0.99

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.04

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.30

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.59

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and BND is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RSPR vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than BND's 3.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.90%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.91%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and BND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPRBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-18.58%

-23.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-2.44%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

-17.91%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.96%

-18.58%

-23.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.51%

-2.58%

-8.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-3.07%

-6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.39%

0.89%

+3.50%

Volatility

RSPR vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.63%. This indicates that RSPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSPRBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

1.63%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

2.52%

+7.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

4.30%

+12.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

6.00%

+13.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

5.52%

+15.86%