PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPE vs. DIVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPE vs. DIVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPE achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly lower than DIVG's 18.41% return.


RSPE

1D
0.71%
1M
0.61%
6M
11.63%
YTD
16.35%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.99%

DIVG

1D
0.39%
1M
3.17%
6M
13.40%
YTD
18.41%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.86K$73.63K$69.04K
$309.58K$266.66K$342.82K

RSPE vs. DIVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
16.35%14.58%10.87%6.49%
DIVG
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF
18.41%11.31%16.60%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPE and DIVG is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023

0.83

The correlation between RSPE and DIVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPE vs. DIVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPE
DIVG

Technology

17.9%
10.1%

Industrials

17.4%
4.3%

Financial Services

15.5%
29.3%

Healthcare

13.4%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
12.3%

Real Estate

6.8%
11.8%

Basic Materials

4.7%
5.5%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.9%

Utilities

2.8%
13.8%

Energy

-

7.3%

Technology

RSPE
17.9%
DIVG
10.1%

Industrials

RSPE
17.4%
DIVG
4.3%

Financial Services

RSPE
15.5%
DIVG
29.3%

Healthcare

RSPE
13.4%
DIVG
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPE
11.1%
DIVG
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

RSPE
6.8%
DIVG
12.3%

Real Estate

RSPE
6.8%
DIVG
11.8%

Basic Materials

RSPE
4.7%
DIVG
5.5%

Communication Services

RSPE
3.6%
DIVG
2.9%

Utilities

RSPE
2.8%
DIVG
13.8%

Energy

RSPE

-

DIVG
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPE vs. DIVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPE
RSPE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RSPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVG
DIVG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DIVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVG Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPE vs. DIVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPEDIVGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

4.89

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

16.36

-3.75

RSPE vs. DIVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the DIVG Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPE and DIVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPE vs. DIVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, which is greater than DIVG's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPE and DIVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPEDIVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-14.95%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-5.13%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.86%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-2.18%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.53%

+0.67%

Volatility

RSPE vs. DIVG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) is 2.87%, while Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that RSPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPEDIVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.49%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

7.65%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

10.80%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

13.11%

+3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

13.11%

+3.49%

RSPE vs. DIVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVG's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPE vs. DIVG - Dividend Comparison

RSPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than DIVG's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DIVG
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF
2.97%3.15%4.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.44%1.63%1.57%1.91%1.83%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPE and DIVG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVG has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to RSPE (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPE dropped -22.93% vs DIVG's -14.95%.

On 1-year performance, RSPE leads with 27.64% vs 24.96% for DIVG. On fees, RSPE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSPE has performed better with a 27.64% return vs 24.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DIVG.

DIVG has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.44% for RSPE.

RSPE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while DIVG tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSPE and 0.39% for DIVG.

DIVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPE and DIVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer