PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSEAX vs. TANDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSEAX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSEAX achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -13.18% return.


RSEAX

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.26%
YTD
9.71%
6M
9.63%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
13.08%

TANDX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
-13.18%
6M
-13.13%
1Y
-15.71%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSEAX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
9.71%14.44%19.90%26.15%-21.05%20.19%23.44%15.28%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
-13.18%3.67%7.66%8.42%-7.87%19.03%13.39%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RSEAX and TANDX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.75

The correlation between RSEAX and TANDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSEAX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSEAX
RSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TANDX
TANDX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TANDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TANDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TANDX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
TANDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TANDX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSEAX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSEAXTANDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.74

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.98

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

-2.30

+14.05

RSEAX vs. TANDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the TANDX Sharpe Ratio of -1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEAX and TANDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSEAXTANDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

-1.70

+3.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.00

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.01

+0.69

Drawdowns

RSEAX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEAX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEAX and TANDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSEAXTANDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-93.93%

+59.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-16.13%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.68%

-93.93%

+68.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.52%

-93.93%

+66.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-93.93%

+93.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-20.25%

+15.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

6.85%

-4.70%

Volatility

RSEAX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 2.52%. This indicates that RSEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSEAXTANDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.52%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.85%

7.18%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

9.26%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

595.57%

-577.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

496.55%

-477.69%

RSEAX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSEAX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison

RSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, more than TANDX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
10.66%11.81%10.74%4.04%6.61%7.64%0.52%5.07%23.30%9.12%5.47%6.41%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
7.11%6.17%3.71%2.10%1.48%4.57%0.33%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSEAX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSEAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to TANDX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEAX dropped -34.37% vs TANDX's -93.93%.

RSEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSEAX and TANDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer