PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSEAX vs. RLVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSEAX vs. RLVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSEAX achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than RLVSX's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RSEAX has outperformed RLVSX with an annualized return of 13.07%, while RLVSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


RSEAX

1D
1.05%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.52%
6M
8.00%
1Y
22.91%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
13.07%

RLVSX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.30%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.00%
1Y
6.05%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSEAX vs. RLVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
8.52%14.44%19.90%26.15%-21.05%20.19%23.44%29.58%-9.98%20.77%
RLVSX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
1.86%4.26%1.76%6.11%-7.58%2.03%4.05%7.38%1.45%4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RSEAX and RLVSX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

-0.03

The correlation between RSEAX and RLVSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSEAX vs. RLVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSEAX
RSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

RLVSX
RLVSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RLVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RLVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSEAX vs. RLVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSEAXRLVSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.96

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.80

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.39

9.89

+0.49

RSEAX vs. RLVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the RLVSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEAX and RLVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSEAX vs. RLVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEAX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than RLVSX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEAX and RLVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSEAXRLVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-11.77%

-22.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-2.17%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.68%

-4.22%

-21.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.52%

-11.77%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

-11.77%

-22.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.13%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-1.53%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

0.61%

+1.58%

Volatility

RSEAX vs. RLVSX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund (RLVSX) at 0.48%. This indicates that RSEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSEAXRLVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

0.48%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

1.40%

+8.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

1.77%

+10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

3.10%

+15.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

3.33%

+15.57%

RSEAX vs. RLVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RLVSX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSEAX vs. RLVSX - Dividend Comparison

RSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than RLVSX's 3.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLVSX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt Bond Fund
3.51%3.18%3.57%3.20%2.73%2.06%2.58%3.08%2.89%2.65%2.64%2.80%
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
10.78%11.81%10.74%4.04%6.61%7.64%0.52%5.07%23.30%9.12%5.47%6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSEAX and RLVSX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSEAX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to RLVSX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEAX dropped -34.37% vs RLVSX's -11.77%.

RLVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSEAX and RLVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer