PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSEAX vs. FEQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSEAX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSEAX having a 9.71% return and FEQHX slightly higher at 10.01%.


RSEAX

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.26%
YTD
9.71%
6M
9.63%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
13.08%

FEQHX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.34%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.45%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSEAX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
9.71%14.44%19.90%26.15%-3.07%
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
10.01%13.61%19.46%17.65%-4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RSEAX and FEQHX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.95

The correlation between RSEAX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSEAX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSEAX
RSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQHX
FEQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FEQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSEAX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSEAXFEQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.11

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

12.42

-0.66

RSEAX vs. FEQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FEQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSEAX and FEQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSEAXFEQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.52

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.32

-0.62

Drawdowns

RSEAX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSEAX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSEAX and FEQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSEAXFEQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-10.42%

-23.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-7.40%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.68%

-10.42%

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-2.22%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.85%

+0.30%

Volatility

RSEAX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) have volatilities of 2.75% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSEAXFEQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.68%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.85%

6.63%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

9.15%

+2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

11.24%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

11.24%

+7.62%

RSEAX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSEAX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSEAX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison

RSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, more than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
0.51%0.43%0.61%0.77%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
10.66%11.81%10.74%4.04%6.61%7.64%0.52%5.07%23.30%9.12%5.47%6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RSEAX and FEQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RSEAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FEQHX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSEAX dropped -34.37% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.

FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSEAX and FEQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer