RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RS2K.DE (Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - RS2K.DE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000®, while LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RS2K.DE returned 10.42%/yr vs 21.41%/yr for LYMS.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RS2K.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.

Performance

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR (RS2K.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RS2K.DE achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RS2K.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 10.42%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.

RS2K.DE

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 6M: 16.58%
• 1Y: 37.98%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

LYMS.DE

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 37.20%
• 3Y*: 24.71%
• 5Y*: 18.88%
• 10Y*: 21.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RS2K.DE Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR	17.82%	1.29%	15.87%	14.96%	-16.48%	24.69%	8.27%	29.13%	-8.90%	0.74%
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	20.63%	7.15%	33.72%	51.52%	-29.87%	39.59%	34.60%	42.84%	3.18%	15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RS2K.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014	0.69

The correlation between RS2K.DE and LYMS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RS2K.DE

RS2K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 68
RS2K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RS2K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RS2K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RS2K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RS2K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 71

LYMS.DE

LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR (RS2K.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RS2K.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.40	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	3.19	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	3.77	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	11.23	+1.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RS2K.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RS2K.DE and LYMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RS2K.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	2.40	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.94	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	1.08	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.77	-0.26

Drawdowns

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RS2K.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS2K.DE and LYMS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RS2K.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.14%	-50.00%	+8.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-10.02%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.48%	-26.74%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.48%	-31.12%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.14%	-31.12%	-10.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.86%	+0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.33%	-8.78%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	3.37%	-0.46%

Volatility

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR (RS2K.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that RS2K.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RS2K.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	4.37%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.27%	10.99%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.14%	15.73%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.94%	19.91%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.61%	19.68%	+1.93%

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RS2K.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

RS2K.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RS2K.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.65%	0.69%	0.76%	1.09%	1.18%
RS2K.DE Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RS2K.DE and LYMS.DE in my portfolio?

RS2K.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RS2K.DE or LYMS.DE?

On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RS2K.DE or LYMS.DE?

LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RS2K.DE.

What is the main difference between RS2K.DE and LYMS.DE?

RS2K.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. RS2K.DE tracks Russell 2000®, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RS2K.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.