PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR (RS2K.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RS2K.DE is traded in EUR, while CEU2.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CEU2.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RS2K.DE achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than CEU2.L's 7.79% return.


RS2K.DE

1D
0.92%
1M
3.09%
YTD
17.82%
6M
16.58%
1Y
37.98%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
10.42%

CEU2.L

1D
0.46%
1M
1.06%
YTD
7.79%
6M
9.94%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RS2K.DE
Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR
17.82%1.29%15.87%14.96%-16.48%11.68%
CEU2.L
Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR
7.79%18.95%8.87%16.15%-8.84%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RS2K.DE and CEU2.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021

0.59

The correlation between RS2K.DE and CEU2.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RS2K.DE
RS2K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RS2K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RS2K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RS2K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RS2K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RS2K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CEU2.L
CEU2.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CEU2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR (RS2K.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RS2K.DECEU2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

1.68

+2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.05

6.26

+6.79

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RS2K.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the CEU2.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RS2K.DE and CEU2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RS2K.DECEU2.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.14

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.66

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.79

-0.29

Drawdowns

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RS2K.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than CEU2.L's maximum drawdown of -20.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RS2K.DE and CEU2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RS2K.DECEU2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.14%

-20.09%

-21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-9.54%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.48%

-15.87%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.48%

-20.09%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-3.55%

-5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.56%

+0.35%

Volatility

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR (RS2K.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Amundi Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR (CEU2.L) at 4.75%. This indicates that RS2K.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEU2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RS2K.DECEU2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

4.75%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

11.77%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

14.07%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

15.11%

+5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

14.97%

+6.64%

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RS2K.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CEU2.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

RS2K.DE vs. CEU2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RS2K.DE nor CEU2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RS2K.DE and CEU2.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEU2.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEU2.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RS2K.DE.

RS2K.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CEU2.L is Europe Equities. RS2K.DE tracks Russell 2000®, while CEU2.L tracks MSCI Europe Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RS2K.DE and 0.12% for CEU2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RS2K.DE and CEU2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer