PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RQEIX vs. PWDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RQEIX vs. PWDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) and Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund (PWDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQEIX achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than PWDIX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RQEIX has outperformed PWDIX with an annualized return of 6.21%, while PWDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.51% annualized return.


RQEIX

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.77%
YTD
8.58%
6M
8.36%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
6.21%

PWDIX

1D
-1.19%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
9.51%
6M
10.44%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
5.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQEIX vs. PWDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RQEIX
RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund
8.58%14.97%15.35%20.27%-17.06%-8.45%14.11%7.53%-6.02%11.94%
PWDIX
Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund
9.51%17.73%12.33%-0.18%-9.83%31.54%-6.54%-2.84%-7.97%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RQEIX and PWDIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.53

The correlation between RQEIX and PWDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RQEIX vs. PWDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQEIX
RQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PWDIX
PWDIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PWDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PWDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQEIX vs. PWDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) and Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund (PWDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RQEIXPWDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.38

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.75

4.32

+3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.53

13.20

+6.33

RQEIX vs. PWDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQEIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the PWDIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQEIX and PWDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RQEIXPWDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

2.16

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.46

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.38

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.41

-0.18

Drawdowns

RQEIX vs. PWDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQEIX drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum PWDIX drawdown of -40.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQEIX and PWDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RQEIXPWDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.25%

-40.86%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-5.44%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-16.86%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.96%

-21.29%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

-40.86%

+7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-1.61%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-8.53%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.78%

-0.45%

Volatility

RQEIX vs. PWDIX - Volatility Comparison

RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund (PWDIX) at 2.76%. This indicates that RQEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RQEIXPWDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.76%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.36%

7.52%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.04%

10.93%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

14.12%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

14.51%

+1.52%

RQEIX vs. PWDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQEIX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PWDIX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RQEIX vs. PWDIX - Dividend Comparison

RQEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.64%, more than PWDIX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWDIX
Donoghue Forlines Dividend Fund
1.84%1.22%2.16%1.75%1.29%2.31%3.66%3.10%30.58%3.25%1.45%3.55%
RQEIX
RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund
13.64%14.53%0.38%0.00%0.38%0.00%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RQEIX and PWDIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RQEIX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to PWDIX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQEIX dropped -33.25% vs PWDIX's -40.86%.

RQEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQEIX and PWDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer