RPTTX vs. SGFFX
RPTTX (T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth I) and SGFFX (Sparrow Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RPTTX returned 7.69%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for SGFFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPTTX charges 0.67%/yr vs 1.81%/yr for SGFFX.
Performance
RPTTX vs. SGFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPTTX achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly higher than SGFFX's 2.50% return.
RPTTX
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SGFFX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
RPTTX vs. SGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPTTX T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth I | 3.99% | 10.48% | 23.99% | 21.00% | -24.50% | 13.69% | 32.02% | 38.08% | -3.02% | 13.20% |
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | 2.50% | 14.31% | 34.81% | 17.02% | -23.36% | -11.00% | 97.83% | 27.24% | 6.26% | 19.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPTTX and SGFFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RPTTX and SGFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPTTX vs. SGFFX — Risk / Return Rank
RPTTX
SGFFX
RPTTX vs. SGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth I (RPTTX) and Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPTTX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.78 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.70 | 2.61 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPTTX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.92 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.25 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.28 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
RPTTX vs. SGFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPTTX drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum SGFFX drawdown of -62.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPTTX and SGFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPTTX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -62.10% | +26.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -15.33% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.04% | -39.29% | +14.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.62% | -40.24% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -16.74% | +15.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -22.17% | +13.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 4.58% | -0.13% |
Volatility
RPTTX vs. SGFFX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth I (RPTTX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) at 2.84%. This indicates that RPTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPTTX | SGFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 2.84% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 9.85% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 12.96% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 27.11% | -5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 27.98% | -5.92% |
RPTTX vs. SGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPTTX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than SGFFX's 1.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPTTX vs. SGFFX - Dividend Comparison
RPTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, while SGFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPTTX T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Growth I | 7.59% | 7.89% | 8.53% | 6.85% | 1.22% | 10.29% | 4.89% | 2.13% | 5.38% | 3.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.33% | 5.84% | 7.33% | 0.00% | 2.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPTTX and SGFFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPTTX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to SGFFX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPTTX dropped -35.91% vs SGFFX's -62.10%.
SGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPTTX and SGFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer