PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPTIX vs. PKSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPTIX vs. PKSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class I (RPTIX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPTIX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than PKSFX's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RPTIX has underperformed PKSFX with an annualized return of 9.98%, while PKSFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.68% annualized return.


RPTIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.74%
YTD
2.23%
6M
1.82%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
9.98%

PKSFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
3.17%
6M
3.35%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
14.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPTIX vs. PKSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPTIX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class I
2.23%3.79%9.48%20.42%-22.39%15.07%24.31%31.69%-1.99%24.97%
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
3.17%-2.58%13.67%32.32%-10.77%19.03%21.38%40.21%-1.99%34.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RPTIX and PKSFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.85

The correlation between RPTIX and PKSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPTIX vs. PKSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPTIX
RPTIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
RPTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RPTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

PKSFX
PKSFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PKSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PKSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPTIX vs. PKSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class I (RPTIX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPTIXPKSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.06

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

0.41

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

0.87

+2.19

RPTIX vs. PKSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPTIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the PKSFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPTIX and PKSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPTIXPKSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.30

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.43

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.78

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.56

-0.02

Drawdowns

RPTIX vs. PKSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPTIX drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, smaller than the maximum PKSFX drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPTIX and PKSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPTIXPKSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-54.46%

+18.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-11.19%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.02%

-21.82%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.99%

-22.02%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.94%

-33.45%

-2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-7.97%

+6.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-7.17%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

5.34%

-2.40%

Volatility

RPTIX vs. PKSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class I (RPTIX) is 3.41%, while Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that RPTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PKSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPTIXPKSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

4.22%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

10.99%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

15.31%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

17.93%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

18.83%

-0.11%

RPTIX vs. PKSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPTIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than PKSFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPTIX vs. PKSFX - Dividend Comparison

RPTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than PKSFX's 13.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
13.86%14.30%4.07%4.12%6.65%12.05%7.45%4.03%4.33%0.17%5.69%19.83%
RPTIX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class I
6.31%6.45%10.24%6.48%2.59%10.67%4.54%5.41%12.28%8.18%3.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPTIX and PKSFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKSFX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to RPTIX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPTIX dropped -35.94% vs PKSFX's -54.46%.

RPTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPTIX and PKSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer