RPIHX vs. TRRJX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RPIHX (T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund) and TRRJX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund) are both mutual funds - RPIHX is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TRRJX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, RPIHX returned 6.04%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for TRRJX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPIHX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TRRJX.

Performance

RPIHX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIHX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than TRRJX's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, RPIHX has underperformed TRRJX with an annualized return of 6.04%, while TRRJX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.

RPIHX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 2.95%
• 1Y: 9.39%
• 3Y*: 11.13%
• 5Y*: 4.67%
• 10Y*: 6.04%

TRRJX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 8.90%
• 6M: 8.39%
• 1Y: 15.00%
• 3Y*: 13.67%
• 5Y*: 6.45%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPIHX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPIHX T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund	1.35%	11.91%	10.44%	15.12%	-13.09%	3.08%	5.89%	14.90%	-1.76%	8.71%
TRRJX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund	8.90%	10.96%	11.99%	18.14%	-17.96%	15.21%	17.04%	23.72%	-6.95%	20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIHX and TRRJX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.43

The correlation between RPIHX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RPIHX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPIHX

RPIHX Risk / Return Rank: 90
RPIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RPIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RPIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
RPIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RPIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

TRRJX

TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 31
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPIHX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPIHX	TRRJX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	1.46	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.58	2.01	+3.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	1.28	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	1.99	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.05	7.60	+7.46

RPIHX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIHX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RPIHX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIHX drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIHX and TRRJX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPIHX	TRRJX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.77%	-53.57%	+29.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.91%	-8.06%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.76%	-12.52%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.25%	-25.85%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.77%	-30.14%	+6.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.39%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-6.63%	+3.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	2.09%	-1.46%

Volatility

RPIHX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) is 0.92%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that RPIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRRJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPIHX	TRRJX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	3.85%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.45%	9.37%	-6.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21%	10.98%	-7.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.39%	12.92%	-8.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.35%	13.57%	-8.22%

RPIHX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPIHX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

RPIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.03%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPIHX T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund	9.03%	8.86%	8.31%	7.43%	8.56%	5.42%	5.37%	6.43%	7.34%	6.29%	6.20%	0.00%
TRRJX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.36%	4.68%	9.67%	6.89%	4.80%	5.68%	8.55%	3.80%	2.89%	4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPIHX and TRRJX in my portfolio?

RPIHX and TRRJX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPIHX or TRRJX?

TRRJX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to RPIHX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIHX dropped -23.77% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.