PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIHX vs. TRBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIHX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIHX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RPIHX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 6.04%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.70% annualized return.


RPIHX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.35%
6M
2.95%
1Y
9.39%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
6.04%

TRBCX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
0.19%
6M
-0.94%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
17.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPIHX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPIHX
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
1.35%11.91%10.44%15.12%-13.09%3.08%5.89%14.90%-1.76%8.71%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.19%18.78%48.46%49.42%-38.57%17.54%34.73%29.97%2.00%36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIHX and TRBCX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.34

The correlation between RPIHX and TRBCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIHX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPIHX
RPIHX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
RPIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBCX
TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPIHX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPIHXTRBCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.17

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

0.98

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.05

3.23

+11.82

RPIHX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIHX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPIHX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIHX drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, smaller than the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIHX and TRBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIHXTRBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-54.56%

+30.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-17.01%

+14.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-23.08%

+19.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-43.63%

+24.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-43.63%

+19.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-5.67%

+5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-11.29%

+8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

5.14%

-4.51%

Volatility

RPIHX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) is 0.92%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that RPIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIHXTRBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

6.46%

-5.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

14.49%

-12.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

17.62%

-14.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

24.16%

-19.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

22.87%

-17.52%

RPIHX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPIHX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

RPIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.03%, more than TRBCX's 5.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPIHX
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
9.03%8.86%8.31%7.43%8.56%5.42%5.37%6.43%7.34%6.29%6.20%0.00%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.24%5.25%18.16%3.49%5.87%9.38%1.19%0.36%2.44%2.94%0.67%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIHX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBCX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to RPIHX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIHX dropped -23.77% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

RPIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIHX and TRBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer