PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIHX vs. TBCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIHX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIHX achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than TBCIX's 6.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RPIHX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 6.07%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.01% annualized return.


RPIHX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.14%
YTD
2.04%
6M
3.77%
1Y
10.77%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
6.07%

TBCIX

1D
0.50%
1M
5.56%
YTD
6.27%
6M
6.21%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
29.30%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*
18.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPIHX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPIHX
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
2.04%11.91%10.44%15.12%-13.09%3.08%5.89%14.90%-1.76%8.71%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
6.27%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%34.90%30.30%2.13%36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIHX and TBCIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.34

The correlation between RPIHX and TBCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIHX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPIHX
RPIHX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RPIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPIHX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPIHXTBCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.39

1.59

+1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.56

2.20

+4.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

1.27

+0.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

1.47

+2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.30

4.99

+12.31

RPIHX vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIHX and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPIHXTBCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

1.59

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.59

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

0.79

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.76

+0.48

Drawdowns

RPIHX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIHX drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, smaller than the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIHX and TBCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIHXTBCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-43.26%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-16.96%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-23.06%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-43.26%

+24.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-43.26%

+19.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-8.07%

+5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

5.01%

-4.38%

Volatility

RPIHX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) is 1.12%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that RPIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIHXTBCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

3.44%

-2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

12.00%

-9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

15.65%

-12.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

23.91%

-19.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

22.76%

-17.41%

RPIHX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPIHX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

RPIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%, more than TBCIX's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RPIHX
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
9.58%8.86%8.31%7.43%8.56%5.42%5.37%6.43%7.34%6.29%6.20%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
4.90%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIHX and TBCIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBCIX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to RPIHX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIHX dropped -23.77% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

RPIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIHX and TBCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer