PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPIHX vs. FAHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPIHX vs. FAHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M (FAHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPIHX achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than FAHYX's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, RPIHX has underperformed FAHYX with an annualized return of 6.07%, while FAHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.57% annualized return.


RPIHX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.14%
YTD
2.04%
6M
3.77%
1Y
10.77%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
6.07%

FAHYX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.61%
YTD
7.04%
6M
8.17%
1Y
17.04%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPIHX vs. FAHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPIHX
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
2.04%11.91%10.44%15.12%-13.09%3.08%5.89%14.90%-1.76%8.71%
FAHYX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M
7.04%11.75%9.24%12.04%-11.37%10.74%8.70%17.41%-5.36%11.37%

Correlation

The correlation between RPIHX and FAHYX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.65

The correlation between RPIHX and FAHYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPIHX vs. FAHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPIHX
RPIHX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RPIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FAHYX
FAHYX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FAHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPIHX vs. FAHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M (FAHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPIHXFAHYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.39

3.11

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.56

4.52

+2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

1.62

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

5.55

-1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.30

23.42

-6.12

RPIHX vs. FAHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPIHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is comparable to the FAHYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPIHX and FAHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPIHXFAHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

3.11

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.98

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

0.99

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.13

+0.11

Drawdowns

RPIHX vs. FAHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPIHX drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, smaller than the maximum FAHYX drawdown of -48.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPIHX and FAHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPIHXFAHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-48.37%

+24.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-3.13%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-6.95%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-15.35%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-28.51%

+4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-4.51%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.74%

-0.11%

Volatility

RPIHX vs. FAHYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund (RPIHX) is 1.12%, while Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M (FAHYX) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that RPIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPIHXFAHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.59%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

4.39%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

5.55%

-2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

6.41%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.35%

7.66%

-2.31%

RPIHX vs. FAHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPIHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FAHYX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPIHX vs. FAHYX - Dividend Comparison

RPIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%, more than FAHYX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAHYX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class M
4.13%4.45%3.96%4.45%6.84%4.56%3.47%4.25%5.74%4.66%5.29%4.21%
RPIHX
T. Rowe Price Global High Income Bond Fund
9.58%8.86%8.31%7.43%8.56%5.42%5.37%6.43%7.34%6.29%6.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPIHX and FAHYX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAHYX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to RPIHX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPIHX dropped -23.77% vs FAHYX's -48.37%.

RPIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPIHX and FAHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer